Best Bounce-Back Percentage in YouTube Golf
The percentage of holes right after a bogey-or-worse where a creator responded with a par or better.
Ryan Ruffels leads YouTube Golf in Bounce-Back % at 100%, among creators with a minimum of 5 rounds tracked (9-hole rounds count as half). That's 10% ahead of Evan Thompson in second place.
| Rank | Creator | Bounce-Back % | Rounds | Doubles+/Rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
![]() |
100% | 13.5 rounds | 0.30 |
| 2 |
![]() |
90% | 11 rounds | 0.18 |
| 3 |
![]() |
90% | 9 rounds | 0.22 |
| 4 |
![]() |
85% | 43 rounds | 0.33 |
| 5 |
![]() |
85% | 10.5 rounds | 0.19 |
| 6 |
![]() |
83% | 23.5 rounds | 0.55 |
| 7 |
![]() |
83% | 5 rounds | 2.60 |
| 8 |
![]() |
83% | 15.5 rounds | 0.26 |
| 9 |
![]() |
83% | 6 rounds | 0.67 |
| 10 |
![]() |
82% | 7 rounds | 1.14 |
| 11 |
![]() |
82% | 11 rounds | 0.55 |
| 12 |
![]() |
81% | 11 rounds | 1.27 |
| 13 |
![]() |
80% | 33.5 rounds | 0.51 |
| 14 |
![]() |
78% | 19 rounds | 0.58 |
| 15 |
![]() |
78% | 24 rounds | 0.46 |
| 16 |
![]() |
77% | 5.5 rounds | 0.91 |
| 17 |
![]() |
77% | 11.5 rounds | 0.78 |
| 18 |
![]() |
76% | 8 rounds | 0.93 |
| 19 |
![]() |
75% | 26 rounds | 0.73 |
| 20 |
![]() |
72% | 21 rounds | 0.85 |
| 21 |
![]() |
70% | 15.5 rounds | 1.16 |
| 22 |
![]() |
70% | 8 rounds | 1.00 |
| 23 |
![]() |
68% | 7.5 rounds | 0.80 |
| 24 |
![]() |
63% | 7 rounds | 1.57 |
| 25 |
![]() |
63% | 16.5 rounds | 0.91 |
Min. 5 RE (18 holes = 1; 9 holes = 0.5)
How This Is Calculated
Of every hole a creator played immediately after a bogey-or-worse, the percentage where they responded with a par or better on the very next hole — a direct measure of mental reset rather than raw scoring quality. Two creators with identical overall scoring averages can have very different bounce-back rates: one might string bad holes together while the other consistently steadies the ship, and this is the only leaderboard on the site built specifically to surface that difference. "Chances" only count consecutive holes (hole 9 into hole 10 doesn't count as a bounce-back opportunity even though both are in the same round, and a hole missing from the scorecard breaks the chain), so this only ever draws from rounds with genuinely complete, in-order hole-by-hole data — it's the most data-quality-sensitive stat on the site, and a creator with fewer fully-scored rounds will simply have fewer bounce-back chances counted, not a worse rate.
Related Leaderboards
Last updated 7 hours ago. View all leaderboards →
























