Best Bounce-Back Percentage in YouTube Golf

The percentage of holes right after a bogey-or-worse where a creator responded with a par or better.

Ryan Ruffels leads YouTube Golf in Bounce-Back % at 100%, among creators with a minimum of 5 rounds tracked (9-hole rounds count as half). That's 10% ahead of Evan Thompson in second place.

Rank Creator Bounce-Back % Rounds Doubles+/Rd
1
Ryan Ruffels
Ryan Ruffels
100% 13.5 rounds 0.30
2
Evan Thompson
Evan Thompson
90% 11 rounds 0.18
3
Nick Voke
Nick Voke
90% 9 rounds 0.22
4
Sean Walsh
Sean Walsh
85% 43 rounds 0.33
5
Bryson DeChambeau
Bryson DeChambeau
85% 10.5 rounds 0.19
6
Wesley Bryan
Wesley Bryan
83% 23.5 rounds 0.55
7
Stephen Castaneda
Stephen Castaneda
83% 5 rounds 2.60
8
Chance Taylor
Chance Taylor
83% 15.5 rounds 0.26
9
Marika Batibasaga
Marika Batibasaga
83% 6 rounds 0.67
10
Dimchae
Dimchae
82% 7 rounds 1.14
11
Tooms
Tooms
82% 11 rounds 0.55
12
Rick Shiels
Rick Shiels
81% 11 rounds 1.27
13
Brad Dalke
Brad Dalke
80% 33.5 rounds 0.51
14
Peter Finch
Peter Finch
78% 19 rounds 0.58
15
Garrett Clark
Garrett Clark
78% 24 rounds 0.46
16
Ben Hadden
Ben Hadden
77% 5.5 rounds 0.91
17
Micah Morris
Micah Morris
77% 11.5 rounds 0.78
18
Taco Golf
Taco Golf
76% 8 rounds 0.93
19
Grant Horvat
Grant Horvat
75% 26 rounds 0.73
20
George Bryan
George Bryan
72% 21 rounds 0.85
21
Luke Kwon
Luke Kwon
70% 15.5 rounds 1.16
22
Kyle Berkshire
Kyle Berkshire
70% 8 rounds 1.00
23
Roger Steele
Roger Steele
68% 7.5 rounds 0.80
24
Matt Scharff
Matt Scharff
63% 7 rounds 1.57
25
Fat Perez
Fat Perez
63% 16.5 rounds 0.91

Min. 5 RE (18 holes = 1; 9 holes = 0.5)

How This Is Calculated

Of every hole a creator played immediately after a bogey-or-worse, the percentage where they responded with a par or better on the very next hole — a direct measure of mental reset rather than raw scoring quality. Two creators with identical overall scoring averages can have very different bounce-back rates: one might string bad holes together while the other consistently steadies the ship, and this is the only leaderboard on the site built specifically to surface that difference. "Chances" only count consecutive holes (hole 9 into hole 10 doesn't count as a bounce-back opportunity even though both are in the same round, and a hole missing from the scorecard breaks the chain), so this only ever draws from rounds with genuinely complete, in-order hole-by-hole data — it's the most data-quality-sensitive stat on the site, and a creator with fewer fully-scored rounds will simply have fewer bounce-back chances counted, not a worse rate.

Full leaderboard methodology →

Last updated 7 hours ago. View all leaderboards →